Visual evoked potentials: Normative values from healthy Senegalese adults

Main Article Content

Marcellin Bugeme
Olivier Mukuku
Marième Soda Diop-Sène
Daniel Gams Massi
Lala Bouna Seck

Abstract

Introduction: Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) are potential differences recorded on the scalp in response to visual stimulation. They are obtained with slowly repeated stimuli. The aim of this study was to determine the normative values of the visual evoked potentials in our setting.


Methodology: We conducted a cross-sectional study from February 1 to April 30, 2019 at the Clinical Neurophysiology laboratory of the I.P. Ndiaye Clinic at CHNU Fann in Dakar (Senegal).


Results: We found that men had high averages of N75, P100 and N145 wave latencies and low averages of P100 wave amplitude (p>0.05). However, neither age nor body mass index influenced the parameters of VEPs.


Conclusion: Sex is important physiological variable in establishing laboratory normative values for VEPs. There is a marked difference between the sexes for the VEPs parameters.

Article Details

Bugeme, M., Mukuku, O., Diop-Sène, M. S., Massi, D. G., & Seck, L. B. (2020). Visual evoked potentials: Normative values from healthy Senegalese adults. Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Disorders, 4(2), 49–052. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jnnd.1001034
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2020 Bugeme M, et al.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Holder GE. The effects of chiasmal compression on the pattern visual evoked potential. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. 1978; 45: 278-28.

Gupta S, Gupta G, Deshpande VK. Visual evoked potentials: Impact of age, gender, head size and BMI. Int. J. Biomed. Adv. Res. 2016; 7: 22-26.

Tandon OP, Ram D. Visual evoked responses to pattern reversal in children. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1991; 35: 175-179.

Kaneda Y, Nakayama H, Kagawa K, Furuta N, Ikuta T. Sex differences in visual evoked potential and electroencephalogram of healthy adults. Tokushima J Exp Med. 1996; 43: 143–157. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9100463/

Vanston JE, Strother L. Sex differences in the human visual system. J Neurosci Res. 2017; 95: 617-625. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27870438/

El Machkour M. Mise en place et élaboration des valeurs normales des potentiels évoqués visuels au laboratoire de neurophysiologie clinique du service de neurologie CHU Hassan II à Fès Université Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah. Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie. Thèse, Fès, Maroc. 2011.

Van Orden KF, Sturr JF. Age-related amplitude changes of the pattern reversal evoked potential depend on stimulus spatial frequency and contrast (No. NMRI-90-104). Naval medical research inst bethesda md.1990.

Emmerson-Hanover R, Shearer DE, Creel DJ, Dustman RE. Pattern reversal evoked potentials: gender differences and age-related changes in amplitude and latency. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section. 1994; 92: 93-101. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7511515/

Onofrj M, Thomas A, Iacono D, DˈAndreamatteo G, Paci C. Age-related changes of evoked potentials. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology. 2001; 31: 83-10.